Thermal Conductivity

Information from Humphrey, 2003

    The thermal conductivity of tire shreds is lower than typical soils and varies depending on the size of the tire shreds.  One project completed by Shao, et al. (1995) used tire shred samples with maximum particle sizes of 0.04 to 1 in.  The thermal conductivities ranged:

  • 0.0563 Btu/hr-ft-°F (0.0838 Cal/m-hr-°C) for 0.04 in. particles tested in a thawed state with a water content less than 1% and with low compaction

  • 0.0988 Btu/hr-ft-°F (0.147 Cal/m-hr-°C) for 1 in. tire shreds tested in a frozen state with a water content of 5% and high compaction

    Thermal conductivity was back calculated by Humphrey, Chen, and Eaton (1997) for tire shreds with a maximum size of 2 inches.  A value of 0.12 Btu/hr-ft-°F (0.20 W/m-°C) was obtained.  Table 1 below gives further thermal conductivity values for gravel and five types of tire shreds.
    As particle size increases, and more air can circulate in the voids, thermal conductivity increases, and the tire shreds become less effective as insulators.  For insulation projects, tire shreds with a maximum size of 3 inches should be used.  Figure 1 shows that thermal conductivity also tends to decrease as density increases.

Table 1. Summary of apparent thermal conductivities of air dried tire shreds (Lawrence, et al., 1998)

Sample

Density

Void Ratio

Apparent thermal conductivity

Surcharge

(pcf)

(Mg/m3)

(Btu/hr-ft-°F)

(W/m-°C)

 

117.6

1.88

0.41

0.295

0.510

none

gravel

121.6

1.95

0.36

0.326

0.563

half

 

123.0

1.97

0.34

0.345

0.596

full

 

38.5

0.62

0.85

0.120

0.207

none

F&B-g

43.3

0.69

0.64

0.113

0.195

half

 

45.4

0.73

0.56

0.114

0.197

full

 

39.1

0.63

0.85

0.145

0.251

none

F&B-s

42.8

0.69

0.69

0.130

0.225

half

 

45.3

0.73

0.60

0.134

0.232

full

 

39.7

0.64

0.998

0.159

0.275

none

Palmer

45.1

0.72

0.76

0.119

0.206

half

 

48.5

0.78

0.63

0.125

0.216

full

 

39.2

0.63

0.97

0.158

0.273

none

Pine State

45.4

0.73

0.7

0.139

0.240

half

 

49.6

0.79

0.56

0.114

0.197

full

 

36.0

0.58

1.13

0.184

0.318

none

Sawyer

41.0

0.66

0.87

0.148

0.256

half

 

43.7

0.70

0.76

0.156

0.270

full

Figure 1. Apparent thermal conductivity of tire shreds vs. density (Lawrence, et al., 1998)

 

Back to Main Engineering Page

Back to Main Materials Page


Our source links are not currently working.  We apologize for any inconvenience. 

Questions or comments about beneficial use?  Please direct them to a staff member.

 

The University of Maine

©This is an official publication of The University of Maine.  "Beneficial Use of Solid Waste in Maine."

March 12, 2006.  http://useit.umaine.edu/