Richmond, Maine

Information from Humphrey, 2003
Click here to see photographs of this project

    The project was located on a dead-end road in Richmond, Maine.  The road has fairly light traffic, but once a month between 10 and 40 loaded dump trucks deliver sewage sludge to two farms on the road.  The gravel surfaced road becomes severely rutted during spring thaw.  Tire shreds were used to try to insulate the road and reduce the depth of frost penetration during the winter, effectively eliminating the thawing that causes the heaving of the road surface in the spring.
    Figure 1 shows plan and longitudinal views of the roadway, and how it has been divided into sections.  There are five sections that include tire chips.  Table 1 gives the thickness of each layer of material placed beneath the roadway.  Geotextiles were used for only section A of the roadway.  The entire road was surfaced with 4 inches of gravel.  Figure 2 gives a typical cross section of the roadway.

Figure 1. Plan and longitudinal views of test sections of Richmond field trial

Richmond field trial

Table 1. Summary of test section configuration of Richmond field trial

Summary of Richmond

Figure 2. Typical cross section of Richmond field trial

Cross section

    The tire shreds used in this project had a maximum size of about 2 inches, and were made from approximately 20,000 steel and glass belted tires.  The tire shreds were uniformly graded, and the sand and gravel mixture used as fill over the tire shreds was well-graded.
    Thermocouples and resistivity gauges were used to measure the depth of frost penetration beneath the roadway.  Figures 3 and 4 show the location of these instruments.  Groundwater wells were also installed to keep track of the level of the ground water table and to take samples for water quality testing.

Figure 3. Location of thermocouples and resistivity gauges

thermocouples and resistivity gauges

Figure 4. Longitudinal section showing thermocouples and resistivity gauges in Section C

Section C

    Figure 5 shows the maximum depth of frost penetration for each section of the roadway.  For control sections, the frost penetration ranged from 46 to 63 inches.  For tire shred sections A, B, D, and E, frost penetration ranged from 36 to 40 inches.  Tire shreds work better as insulators when the material is placed closer to the surface of the roadway.  For this reason, frost penetration was deeper for section C than for A and B.

Figure 5. Maximum depth of frost penetration (Humphrey and Eaton, 1995)

max frost penetration

    Figure 6 shows the change in the depth of frost penetration over time.  The control section had an increase in frost depth throughout the entire winter.  Sections A, B, and C had reduced rates of frost penetration compared to the control section, and sections D and E, had no increasing frost depth after early January.

Figure 6. Depth of frost penetration versus date - winter of 1993-4 (Humphrey and Eaton, 1995)

frost vs. date

    A comparison of temperatures above and below the tire shred layers can be seen in the temperature profiles in figure 7.

Figure 7. Temperature profile on February 16, 1994 (Humphrey and Eaton, 1995)

temperate profile

    Figure 8 gives frost heave measurements for the different sections of the road.  Tire shreds reduced heave by up to 25%.

Figure 8. Measured frost heave (Humphrey and Eaton, 1995)

frost heave

 

Our source links are not currently working.  We apologize for any inconvenience. 

Questions or comments about beneficial use?  Please direct them to a staff member.

 

The University of Maine

ŠThis is an official publication of The University of Maine.  "Beneficial Use of Solid Waste in Maine."

March 12, 2006.  http://useit.umaine.edu/